@sebgl wrote:
If anyone else ends up here: the specification was expressed using ECK 0.9 syntax in the first post (
nodes
), instead of using the 1.0.0 syntax (nodeSets
). Using a private registry should work as expected.
@sebgl wrote:
If anyone else ends up here: the specification was expressed using ECK 0.9 syntax in the first post (
nodes
), instead of using the 1.0.0 syntax (nodeSets
). Using a private registry should work as expected.